[c-nsp] ME3800X/ME3600X/ME3600X-24CX/ASR903/ASR901 Deployment Simplification Feedback

[Mark Tinka]

On Sunday, July 21, 2013 04:55:16 PM Aled Morris wrote:

> Maybe an ME version of the 4500-X would be cool.

The multi-rate nature of the 4500-X Ethernet ports would 
make a corresponding chassis-based ME3600X/3800X pricey, I 
presume.

I'd be happy with a Gig-E-only ME3600X/3800X chassis 
(provided we have enough 10Gbps SPF+ uplinks to handle 
them), but of course, if Cisco can make a multi-rate system 
that is cheaper than stacking 1U systems or the ASR9000, I'm 
game :-).

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20130721/1ca551b5/attachment.sig>