[c-nsp] IPv6 Deployment / 6PE

[Ahmed Hilmy]

Hello Aaron,

Thanks for sharing info.
Regarding to send-lable command, Cisco call it a magic command, to make PE
router to advertise IPv6 prefix as a label.
I am working on 6PE deployment.
- PEs & IGW ----- MPBGP ----- RR
- add adress-family ipv6 at PEs & RR ( active & send-label )
It will work


On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Aaron <aaron1 at gvtc.com> wrote:

> (I'm looking at my ios xr asr9k doing this and sending notes about how I
> did
> it, I didn't do the rr yet, but I understand this is how it's done on rr
> too)
>
> IGW....
>
> - Vrf defined...enable ipv6 address family on this vrf...
> - Add internet interface to this vrf...
> - add ipv6 address to this internet interface
> - under bgp, under vrf, enable the appropriate ipv6 native type stuff for
> bgp neighboring, etc (JUST LIKE V4)...but I have no idea why you need
> send-label.
> - enable mpls on connection towards your internal mpls cloud (toward your
> rr) ...for 6vpe only v4 is needed on your internal net
> - on the internal side, enable mpibgp with address-family vpnv6 unicast
> from
> the igw to the rr on both sides and of course from rr to other internal
> pe's
>
> RR....
> - I think the vpvn6 af for that mpibgp session towards igw and other
> internal pe's is all that is required on rr in order to support 6vpe
>
> other internal pe's...
>
> - Vrf defined...enable ipv6 address family on this vrf...
> - Add customer facing interface to this vrf...
> - add ipv6 address to this customer facing interface
> - under bgp, under vrf, enable the appropriate ipv6 native type stuff for
> customer facing pe-ce routing...but I have no idea why you need send-label.
> - enable mpls on connection towards your internal mpls cloud (toward your
> rr) ...for 6vpe only v4 is needed on your internal net
> - on the internal side, enable mpibgp with address-family vpnv6 unicast
> from
> the igw to the rr on both sides and of course from rr to other internal
> pe's
>
>
> Aaron
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> Ahmed Hilmy
> Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2013 5:00 AM
> To: Mikael Abrahamsson
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Deployment / 6PE
>
>  But i dont have MP-BGP between IGW & RR, I have pure BGP IPv4.
> So ?
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson
> <swmike at swm.pp.se>wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 22 Jun 2013, Ahmed Hilmy wrote:
> >
> >  Can i add address family IPv6 at IGW to advertise IPv6 routes to RR,
> >> since it is directly connected ?
> >>
> >
> > Sure. I would configure send-label there as well so that you do thing
> > in a consistent manner, but that's a matter of opinion.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se
> >
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>