[c-nsp] Sup2T - poor netflow performance

[Mattias Gyllenvarg]

Agreed!

Very nice platform, we got hit by the "MPLS payload begins with 0x6" bug.
Couldn't believe it was true.

Also, not only is there no redundant RSP it is not replaceable either.


On 26 March 2013 22:19, Dumitru Ciobarcianu <cisco-nsp at lnx.ro> wrote:

> On 26-Mar-13 18:33 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
> > Ugh.  I can't answer this - we have no Sup2T yet - but I would be very
> > much interested in whether you can get this solved.  We're currently
> > planning our "next gen" hardware, and it will either be ASR9001 or Sup2T
> -
> > and we're leaning towards Sup2T because "that's 6500, we know the
> > platform"... (famous last words).
>
> A bit offtopic:
>
> You're sure you didn't mean 9006 or 9010 ? You can't have redundant RSPs
> in ASR9001, and the chassis is maxed at 12 10G ports...
>
> ASR9001 is a really nice small machine but a bit immature imho.
>
> I have opened tickets for silly bugs like "igmp snooping breaks ospf" or
> "show ip route command chrashed with SIGSEGV". (XR 4.3.0)
>
> Oh, and they finnaly released an SMU for "onboard ports shutd down for
> no reason" but only for 4.2.3, not 4.3.0 ...
>
>
> Dumitru "it compiles? ship it!" C.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>



-- 
*Med Vänliga Hälsningar - Best Regards*

*Mattias Gyllenvarg*
*Nätutveckling*
Bredband2

Tel: +46 406219712