[c-nsp] Cisco2921 vs 7206VXR/NPE-400

[Mark Tinka]

On Tuesday, November 12, 2013 02:03:52 PM Mark Tinka wrote:

> As someone else had suggested, the NPE-G2 is good too,
> but if you need to support more PA's (especially
> non-Ethernet, which tax the fabric less), it's not that
> scalable.

I meant the 7201, of course (which is, essentially, an NPE-
G2 with an extra Gig-E port).

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20131112/fe269d90/attachment.sig>