[c-nsp] fabricpath and vPC+

[Tim Stevenson]

At 09:23 AM 11/13/2013  Wednesday, Arne Larsen  / Region Nordjylland quipped:
>Hi all
>
>What is the correct setup when one is using fabricpath and vPC+
>If 2 5k are direct connected with 2 10G fabricpath interfaces, 
>should these 2 be a channel group
>or doesn't it really matter, because of the equal cost routing in isis


If you really want VPC+, then yes it should be a port channel and 
configured as the VPC peer link. PL & PKA are required in VPC+ just 
like in VPC.

If you don't need VPC+, then yes you could just do parallel FP links 
and use ECMP for load sharing instead of port-channel, it's your choice.

Hope that helps,
Tim




>/Arne
>
>_______________________________________________
>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/




Tim Stevenson, tstevens at cisco.com
Routing & Switching CCIE #5561
Distinguished Technical Marketing Engineer, Cisco Nexus 7000
Cisco - http://www.cisco.com
IP Phone: 408-526-6759
********************************************************
The contents of this message may be *Cisco Confidential*
and are intended for the specified recipients only.