[c-nsp] IPv6 filters

[Scott Voll]

So how do you keep IPv6 off of IPv4?  if you are running dual stack
shouldn't it just go out it's native protocol?

Scott


On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu> wrote:

> On Friday, November 15, 2013 02:56:39 PM Tony Tauber wrote:
>
> > Depending on your OS, you may have to explicitly disable
> > v6 routes being sent over a v4 session.
> > That's possible to do but I don't know why one would want
> > to in a truly dual-stack deployment.
> > In v6 the only "v4 artifact" will be that the router ID
> > is still a 32-bit number which is most commonly set to
> > the v4 loopback or some such.
>
> This has been discussed a few times on this list.
>
> Some operators do it, others don't.
>
> I don't - I prefer to have my address families running over
> their own native transport. Some might see it as double
> work, but it's peace of mind and still looks neat :-).
>
> Mark.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>