[c-nsp] IPv6 filters

[Mark Tinka]

On Friday, November 15, 2013 02:56:39 PM Tony Tauber wrote:

> Depending on your OS, you may have to explicitly disable
> v6 routes being sent over a v4 session.
> That's possible to do but I don't know why one would want
> to in a truly dual-stack deployment.
> In v6 the only "v4 artifact" will be that the router ID
> is still a 32-bit number which is most commonly set to
> the v4 loopback or some such.

This has been discussed a few times on this list.

Some operators do it, others don't.

I don't - I prefer to have my address families running over 
their own native transport. Some might see it as double 
work, but it's peace of mind and still looks neat :-).

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20131119/5d244ec4/attachment.sig>