[c-nsp] ME3600 QoS

Thu Oct 3 11:23:31 EDT 2013

Hi Adam,
I will get back to the team with the resolution update.

Best Regards,

[http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg]

Waris Sagheer
Technical Marketing Manager
Service Provider Access Group
waris at cisco.com<mailto:waris at cisco.com>
Phone: +1 408 853 6682
Mobile: +1 408 835 1389

CCIE - 19901

<http://www.cisco.com/>

[Think before you print.] Think before you print.

This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message.

For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html

From: adam vitkovsky <adam.vitkovsky at swan.sk<mailto:adam.vitkovsky at swan.sk>>
Date: Thursday, October 3, 2013 12:32 AM
To: Waris Sagheer <waris at cisco.com<mailto:waris at cisco.com>>, 'Darren O'Connor' <darrenoc at outlook.com<mailto:darrenoc at outlook.com>>, 'Nick Ryce' <nick at fluency.net.uk<mailto:nick at fluency.net.uk>>, "cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>" <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>>
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] ME3600 QoS

Hi Waris,
This issue was discovered on 15.3(1)S2.
The “multicast ingress to port-channel punted to CPU” issue is persistent in 15.3(2)S2 as well.

adam

From: Waris Sagheer (waris) [mailto:waris at cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 6:59 PM
To: Adam Vitkovsky; 'Darren O'Connor'; 'Nick Ryce'; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 QoS

Hi Adam and Darren,
Which software release you are using? EFP Link Bundling QOS is on the roadmap. I'll get back to you on the exact release.

Best Regards,

[Image removed by sender.]

Waris Sagheer
Technical Marketing Manager
Service Provider Access Group
waris at cisco.com<mailto:waris at cisco.com>
Phone: +1 408 853 6682
Mobile: +1 408 835 1389

CCIE - 19901

[Image removed by sender. Think before you print.] Think before you print.

This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message.

For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html

From: adam vitkovsky <adam.vitkovsky at swan.sk<mailto:adam.vitkovsky at swan.sk>>
Date: Wednesday, August 7, 2013 6:29 AM
To: 'Darren O'Connor' <darrenoc at outlook.com<mailto:darrenoc at outlook.com>>, 'Nick Ryce' <nick at fluency.net.uk<mailto:nick at fluency.net.uk>>, "cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>" <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 QoS

Interesting we've had some 100% CPU until reload ourselves. It was related
to Port-channel and mcast.

adam

From: Darren O'Connor [mailto:darrenoc at outlook.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 3:16 PM
To: Adam Vitkovsky; 'Nick Ryce'; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] ME3600 QoS

On that same vein of port channels. This morning my LACP ports bounced
between my me3600x test box and a Brocade XMR and for some odd reason it
caused my LSP tunnel interfaces to push the CPU up to 99% for a few hours.
Makes me weary about using a PO at all on this box

From: adam.vitkovsky at swan.sk<mailto:adam.vitkovsky at swan.sk>
To: nick at fluency.net.uk<mailto:nick at fluency.net.uk>; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 14:52:17 +0200
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 QoS
> Can be applied to the member ports of the channel.
> Also you can't apply service policies to EFP's on a port channel either.

Thus my conclusion that port-channel interfaces on ME3600 are useless so
far
No incoming multicast
No BFD with ASR9k
No QOS
Though I'm not sure whether some of this has been fixed in the most recent
codes for X and CX
adam
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/