[c-nsp] 6500 IOS recommendation?

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 02:24:59PM -0400, Jon Lewis wrote:
> Are people actually upgrading to 15.1SSY, or just running late 12.2(33)SXI 
> or SXJ until these boxes run out of resources?

"Yes".  It somewhat depends on what we're running into, like "open remote
crash bugs" or "features wanted".

Generally, we like to stay inside a given train (so "SXI/latest") if
that has proven stable and has all the features we need - and on 6500,
we don't seem to get the features I *want* anyway, so we stick to what
we have.

New boxes get 15.1SY, as I can then sort of "field test" this without
affecting too many customers... and if it turns out to be good enough,
we might upgrade the rest.  Or not.  Or downgrade these boxes...

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20131021/e6ca4624/attachment.sig>