[c-nsp] VTP problem between remote PoP
Blake Dunlap
ikiris at gmail.com
Thu Oct 31 11:07:51 EDT 2013
Is this an actual fiber run you control end to end, or actually a metro e
link?
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 4:39 AM, Mark Tees <marktees at gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh my.
>
> It's part of the VTP specification. "VTP frames being sent over a distance
> of 20 light years will be dropped at random."
>
>
>
>
> Or they are just the same as any other frame :)
>
> Sent from some sort of iDevice.
>
> On 31/10/2013, at 7:30 PM, Andrey Teslenko <teslenko.andrey at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> >
> > We observed problem with VTP. VTP updates does not advertise between two
> > switches in the same vtp domain
> >
> >
> >
> > It seems to me that happened because the distance between switches is too
> > long, approximately 40km
> >
> >
> >
> > Who ever observed the same problem?
> > Could distance affect on convergance of VTP?
> >
> >
> >
> > This problem temporary solved after recreating of vtp domain name. But we
> > afraid that this problem will repeat.
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list