[c-nsp] qos plan - advice please

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Sun Sep 1 22:00:51 EDT 2013


On Saturday, August 31, 2013 03:01:16 PM Robert Blayzor 
wrote:

> When  you start getting into lots of TE tunnels and
> fast-reroute, etc.. that's when they get a bit more
> complex and time consuming.

And on that note, thank heavens for (r)LFA. MPLS-FRR is 
great, but it simply needs too much.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20130902/24299168/attachment.sig>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list