[c-nsp] Peering between route reflectors

[Mark Tinka]

On Monday, April 07, 2014 10:07:51 PM Cydon Satyr wrote:

> Right so I think we all came to the same conclusion?
> 
> Taking in consideration that all edge routers peer with
> all RR (which I forgot to mention in original post) AND
> none of them are in the forwarding path, THEN:
> 
> 1) RR should not peer with each other
> 2) The should all be in each separate cluster-id,
> although it doesn't really matter

I will not say whether this is good or bad, as I have no 
practical experience with such a design, and what could 
happen.

I'd certainly suggest testing this under several failure 
scenarios, if for nothing else, just to document the 
practice.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20140407/1b6152db/attachment.sig>