[c-nsp] Rosen-Draft MVPN over BVI 4.2.3

[Vitkovský Adam]

Hi Arron

Right, that is what the TAC engineer told me, that it is supported on 5.1.1 -which basically is a showstopper. 
I'm going to try it with a loopback cable. 


adam
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aaron [mailto:aaron1 at gvtc.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 9:14 PM
> To: Vitkovský Adam; 'Phil Mayers'; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Rosen-Draft MVPN over BVI 4.2.3
> 
> I tried to make this work in my network back in mid-2012... I think I was on
> 4.1.2 at the time....
> 
> I worked with the Cisco TAC IOS XR Team and found this note from an old
> email from back then.... you might need to validate this old note that I got
> from tac.
> 
> Note: TAC determined that bvi isn't supported in mdt , should be in 4.3.1 is
> target for bvi mvpn support...
> 
> 4.2.2 (probably skipped)
> 4.2.3 (9/2012)
> 4.3.0 (12/2012)
> 4.3.1 (3/2013)
> 
> Aaron
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> Vitkovský Adam
> Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 9:17 AM
> To: Phil Mayers; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Rosen-Draft MVPN over BVI 4.2.3
> 
> > I have no experience on XR or BVI, but one random thought to throw in;
> > are you using P-ASM or P-SSM? I've had problems with recent IOS /
> > NX-OS releases using P-ASM, and have since moved to P-SSM with BGP
> > mdt; my guess is that the P-ASM code is not widely used and has
> > bit-rotted at Cisco's end.
> >
> > I mention this because the symptoms I saw were similar to what you
> > describe - (*,g) would form, but no (s,g).
> 
> Yes please in the core I'm using SSM.
> But in the VRF there's just SM and that is where I can't get the (S,G) states.
> 
> adam
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/