[c-nsp] Service Instance

[Pete Lumbis]

I know that there are a number of hardware limitations when it comes to
L2VPN configurations on the SIPs, so it's probably safe to assume that it's
not supported.


On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Raheel Muhammad
<raheel.muhammad at gmail.com>wrote:

> Yup xconnect worked under service instance.
> On 22 Apr 2014 16:10, "Pete Lumbis" <alumbis at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It's possible that Q-inQ mapping isn't supported but EVC style is. If you
>> move it to EVC for the xconnect does it work?
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Raheel Muhammad <
>> raheel.muhammad at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> It works and why i wanted to do it is we already have lot of customers
>>> configured as sub interfaces and this interface is the only option to
>>> configure service instance and i was getting error on sub interface when i
>>> was configuring xconnect on a QinQ sub interface.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Pete Lumbis <alumbis at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Probably not, but I'd ask why? EVC does the same thing as subs but with
>>>> more flexibility?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 4:28 AM, Raheel Muhammad <
>>>> raheel.muhammad at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Might be a stupid question but have never done it, can we mix up
>>>>> service
>>>>> instance and sub interface configuration on the same main interface.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am using SPA-5X1GE-V2 on 7600.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Raheel Muhammad
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>