[c-nsp] Does "backup interface" gratuitous ARP?

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 09:04:58PM -0400, Pete Lumbis wrote:
> This won't work, it won't let you put two IPs in the same subnet on the
> router. 

It does, that's what "backup interface" is for - try it :-)

(Unfortunately they still forgot to add the logic for IPv6)

> What's a better solution would be an EEM script tied to an IP SLA
> so when a failure is detected on g1/1 the EEM script shuts it down, removes
> the IP, configures g1/1, and pings out, forcing an ARP.

Urgh.  Excuse me while I go puking.

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 291 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20140814/ba950241/attachment.sig>