[c-nsp] ME3600-ME3800: service-instance & bridge-domain syntax

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Tue Jan 14 06:49:28 EST 2014


On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 12:05:51 PM Pasquino Andrea 
wrote:

> what is the best practice for the configuration of L3VPN
> on Cisco ME3XXX ?

In this particular case, to be honest, I feel the old way is 
better because there are fewer configuration lines to 
have/host.

You are defining the BD anyway, and the BD consumes a global 
VLAN (unlike the EVC) anyway. So unless there are some 
specific BD features that you want (which are only 
available/possible under the "bridge-domain" configuration 
heirarchy), I'd forego the extra typing.

Just me...

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20140114/d2410983/attachment.sig>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list