[c-nsp] ME3600-ME3800: service-instance & bridge-domain syntax

[Pasquino Andrea]

Mark,

I agree with you. Sometimes I feel annoyed when I see IOS syntax changing without a clear roadmap.
Maybe if Waris was around he could clarify the subjects. 

Regards

Andrea

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Tinka [mailto:mark.tinka at seacom.mu] 
Sent: martedì 14 gennaio 2014 12:49
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Cc: Pasquino Andrea
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600-ME3800: service-instance & bridge-domain syntax

On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 12:05:51 PM Pasquino Andrea
wrote:

> what is the best practice for the configuration of L3VPN on Cisco 
> ME3XXX ?

In this particular case, to be honest, I feel the old way is better because there are fewer configuration lines to have/host.

You are defining the BD anyway, and the BD consumes a global VLAN (unlike the EVC) anyway. So unless there are some specific BD features that you want (which are only available/possible under the "bridge-domain" configuration heirarchy), I'd forego the extra typing.

Just me...

Mark.