[c-nsp] Redundancy options for Dual Home Devices using EoMPLS or VPLS

[Mark Tinka]

On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 05:06:33 PM 
daniel.dib at reaper.nu wrote:

> The devices will likely be ASR9001 for PE and ME2600 for
> Access.

I would go for the ME3600X, as that gets you proper IPv4, 
IPv6 and MPLS in the Access, along with features.

The ME2600X is great, but lacks the Layer 3 and MPLS 
capabilities (along with a few QoS restrictions, but still 
better than any other switches in Cisco's arsenal).

With the ME3600X, all you need to worry about is resiliency 
to your customers. Typically, I'd leave it up to them, 
rather than you doing fancy things like MC-LAG, VRRP, e.t.c.

Cheers,

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20140114/a6c1fe18/attachment.sig>