[c-nsp] Re ASR9000 Multicast over P2MP TE tunnels

[Cydon Satyr]

Thanks.

Yeah mLDP is nicer for mvpn.
We're playing/experimenting with P2MP tunnels for IPTV and with FRR
protection.

So, what I'm trying to do is map "global" multicast traffic to P2MP, not
vrf traffic.

I'm not seeing anything going trough.
I wanted to check if anyone has configured this before in case I indeed
missed some commands.

Regards


On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu> wrote:

> On Wednesday, July 02, 2014 09:18:43 AM Catalin Petrescu
> wrote:
>
> > Another test we did is to have the xr as a receiver , the
> > p2mp tunnel is building , but as you said no LSP-VIF
> > interface , thus the rpf check will fail. I never got it
> > to work as advertised and ended up using mldp.
>
> I know Cisco were pushing mLDP more that p2mp RSVP-TE.
> However, they have had p2mp RSVP-TE support for a while now,
> and I even know of inter-op tests between an ASR9000 and an
> MX480 that work. Perhaps best to open a case.
>
> That said, I'm also in favour of mLDP these days. It's
> simpler and just as effective for general Multicast use-
> cases.
>
> Mark.
>