[c-nsp] Re ASR9000 Multicast over P2MP TE tunnels

[Mark Tinka]

On Wednesday, July 02, 2014 10:42:29 AM Cydon Satyr wrote:

> Yeah mLDP is nicer for mvpn.
> We're playing/experimenting with P2MP tunnels for IPTV
> and with FRR protection.

I originally used p2mp RSVP-TE for IPTv, but I'm also 
comfortable using mLDP for IPTv as well.

There is work ongoing to add LFA support to mLDP, and in 
that case, the FRR argument for keeping IPTv on p2mp RSVP-TE 
will be out the window.

That said, I've been happy with convergence times using 
hardware-assited BFD which would make pre-mLDP-LFA scenarios 
workable, considering how well mLDP scales and how much more 
complex p2mp RSVP-TE is to configure in large networks.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20140702/f60fbe05/attachment.sig>