[c-nsp] I need to limit BW ASR9K

Jared Mauch jared at puck.nether.net
Wed Jul 2 10:24:21 EDT 2014


You may want to use percentage based policing on bundle-ethernet interfaces as it will avoid this particular warning/defect.

- Jared

On Jul 2, 2014, at 10:18 AM, Elizabeth Millan Castaño <emillan at mediacommerce.net.co> wrote:

> El 02/07/14 08:59, Elizabeth Millan Castaño escribió:
>> 
>> 
>> Cordial Saludo,
>> 
>> I have the following problem in a Cisco ASR9K. I need to limit BW of an interface Bundle-Ethernet to 1075Mbps. This Bundle is a LACP made with two giga-ethernet interfaces. I've applied a policy-map with rate 1075Mbps. (See Configuration).
>> 
>> 
>> policy-map BW_Internet_IXA
>> class class-default
>> police rate 1075 mbps
>> conform-action transmit
>> exceed-action drop
>> end-policy-map
>> 
>> 
>> The Cisco ASR9K, show the following Errors.
>> 
>> !! SEMANTIC ERRORS: This configuration was rejected by
>> !! the system due to semantic errors. The individual
>> !! errors with each failed configuration command can be
>> !! found below.
>> 
>> 
>> interface Bundle-Ether2
>> service-policy input BW_Internet_IXA
>> !!% 'qos-lib' detected the 'warning' condition 'MQC: Policer conform rate is greater than the reference parent bandwidth'
>> service-policy output BW_Internet_IXA
>> !!% 'qos-lib' detected the 'warning' condition 'MQC: Policer conform rate is greater than the reference parent bandwidth'
>> !
>> end
>> 
>> What's missing inthe configuration?. Do I have to change my interfaces to one Tengiga?
>> 
>> 
>> Atentamente,
>> *
>> Elizabeth Millán Castaño*
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/




More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list