[c-nsp] why there are no plans for A903-RSP2B-240 please?????

[Mark Tinka]

On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 04:38:59 PM Tim Durack wrote:

> Feature set is C6K/C76K 15.1SY. Full MPLS L3VPN. Also
> VPLS. Waiting to see if PBB-EVPN arrives.
> 
> If deployed in pairs, redundant supervisor may not be an
> issue. I don't find ISSU and " stacking" to be very
> successful with most platforms. Ymmv.

We're deploying quite a bunch of the C6880's in core switch 
roles. So very simple, pure Layer 2 switching, no fancy IP 
or MPLS features enabled.

It's a good box, based on the SUP2T, so lots of software 
features Day One. 

It does generate a lot of heat, so cooling is a major 
concern for this box.

Of all the ones we've deployed so far, no major dramas. 
We've had a fan module fail, but the rest kept working well. 
Replacement for this has been received.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20140722/99fa2f13/attachment.sig>