[c-nsp] why there are no plans for A903-RSP2B-240 please?????

[Mark Tinka]

On Wednesday, July 23, 2014 11:04:05 AM Vitkovský Adam 
wrote:

> Oh I can imagine.
> And one can only wish it I'll get there involving no
> major bugs.

It'll come, eventually.

Juniper have always been more RSVP-centric (and BGP-
centric), while Cisco have generally favoured LDP. But 
eventually, they all come to the table.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20140723/da6c1221/attachment.sig>