[c-nsp] Cisco mem issue

[Sigurbjörn Birkir Lárusson]

I experienced a very high failure rate of SUP720-3BXLs in 7600s when I
update to 12.2(33)SRE (quite some time ago).  At the time I update 12
nodes with 18 supervisors and had 4 separate supervisor failures, at the
time I figured it was just bad luck but after I read about this issue I
started wondering whether it could have been related.

Kind regards,
Sibbi

On 6.3.2014 17:39, "Mark Lancaster" <marklanc at gmail.com> wrote:

>Yes, we have experienced a large amount of memory failures in our 28xx
>routers that have been deployed in the field for about ~3-4 years now.
> I figured there was a much larger issue with component quality going
>on.
>
>/m
>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 14:32:59 +0200
>> From: Tassos Chatzithomaoglou <achatz at forthnet.gr>
>> To: cisco-nsp <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
>> Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco mem issue
>> Message-ID: <5317197B.3020901 at forthnet.gr>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>>
>>
>> Has anyone experienced the recently announced mem issue?
>>
>> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/memory.html
>>
>> affected parts: 
>>http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/memory_pu.html
>>
>> Proposed fix-on-fail solution seems risky.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Tassos
>>
>>
>>
>_______________________________________________
>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/