[c-nsp] "ipv6 router ospf" vs "router ospfv3"

[Mark Tinka]

On Tuesday, March 25, 2014 05:51:17 PM Phil Mayers wrote:

> Yeah, I spotted this very recently too in 15.1 on
> 6500/sup720. Haven't had time to test it yet beyond
> basic confirmation that it works for IPv6-only.

I just checked a 7200 I have and it has the context also.

This is 15.2(4)S3 on an NPE-G1.

> Almost certainly. Note that some commands e.g. "network
> point-to-point" are not available on some platforms in
> the "ipv6" format, only the "ospfv3" one.

Ah, okay.

Well, I tried "network point-to-point" for IPv6 on Quagga 
and it's not supported. So that broke that :-).

I'm normally an IS-IS man, but we use OSPF for Anycast since 
IS-IS in Quagga is unusable.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20140325/13dad0d1/attachment.sig>