[c-nsp] MVPN vs. plain-old-multicast

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Mon Nov 24 23:13:56 EST 2014


On Monday, November 24, 2014 11:08:04 PM Jason Lixfeld 
wrote:

> In order to do MVPN, we’d have to enable PIM between the
> ME3600s and the A9Ks anyway, so since this is all in a
> common VRF, is there really any benefit to doing MVPN?

You never know when your Multicast services will extend to 
commercial offerings to customers.

Given the way Multicast is, I'd always recommend running it 
in an MVPN even though it's for internal use.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20141125/3367d6aa/attachment.sig>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list