[c-nsp] Cisco IOS 15.4(2)T unified mpls send-label

[Tim Durack]

Thanks for the response. The missing piece for me was understanding that
send-label depends on labels allocated by ldp(v4).

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:31 AM, Vitkovský Adam <adam.vitkovsky at swan.sk>
wrote:

> > I would like to enable send-label on ipv6 bgp neighbors, and move vpnv6
> > over to ipv6.
>
> Even though you'd be able to advertise PE loopbacks along with their
> labels via ipv6 bgp transport sessions.
> These PE loopbacks still needs to be IPv4 addresses so that LDP can
> allocate labels for them within the particular area.
> So you would not be able to move VPNv6 to IPv6 anyways.
>
> adam
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> > Tim Durack
> > Sent: Friday, September 26, 2014 8:31 PM
> > To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco IOS 15.4(2)T unified mpls send-label
> >
> > I am lab testing "unified mpls" using bgp send-label. This is working
> well for
> > ipv4/vpnv4/vpnv6.
> >
> > I would like to enable send-label on ipv6 bgp neighbors, and move vpnv6
> > over to ipv6.
> >
> > Doesn't look like send-label is a supported feature in 15.4(2)T1 for
> ipv6 bgp
> > neighbors unless I am missing something.
> >
> > Anyone else run into this?
> >
> > --
> > Tim:>
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>



-- 
Tim:>