[c-nsp] Nightmare for load balancing of L2VPN traffic on CRS (traffic from ME3600)

[Mark Tinka]

On 14/Apr/15 16:27, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou via cisco-nsp wrote:
> We have been fighting with Cisco for this (L2VPN PW load balancing) for a long time.
> Besides a good (which could have been much better) level of support on the ASR9k, it's a shame that all other new equipment doesn't even support FAT or any other good alternative.
> PS: As a temporary workaround, we have increased the number of PWs accross the network.

Juniper support this in current code.

Use them to get what you want from Cisco - or better yet, just use them.

Mark.