[c-nsp] Equipment for a large-ish LAN event
Laurent Dumont
ldumont at coldnorthadmin.com
Tue Dec 8 16:27:25 EST 2015
Apologies for that last email, Thunderbird wasn't too nice with ASCII.
+-----------2x10G----------+CORE - Routing to external
| |
| |
| |
| |
2x10G| | 2x10G
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
+--------------------------+ 3650 As Distribution switches
2x10G |
|
|2960X as Access with 2x1G Uplinks
|
|
+-------+----------+
| |
| | Players
| |
+------------------+
On 12/8/2015 4:23 PM, Laurent Dumont wrote:
> Here is a rough draft of our usual topology. Imagine a few more
> "Players" section scattered around the 2x10G rings.
>
> We are already planning for IPV6 but that really depends on our
> upstream ability to actually provide the feature. Very good point
> about BCP38, that is not something we had considered. We usually
> segment the network for each row of tables which usually ends up being
> 48 players in the same vlan.
>
> Thanks!
>
> +-----------2x10G----------+-------CORE - Routing to external
> | |
> | |
> | |
> | |
> 2x10G| | 2x10G
> | |
> | |
> +-------------------------------+ 3650 - Distribution
> switches for the 2x10G ring
> 2x10G |
> |
> |2960X as Access with 2x1G
> Uplinks
> |
> |
> +-------+----------+
> | |
> | | Players
> | |
> +------------------+
>
>
>
> On 12/8/2015 3:34 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>> On Tue, 8 Dec 2015, Laurent Dumont wrote:
>>
>>> We were looking at either the Nexus 7004 chassis or the ASR
>>> 9004/9006 chassis as the core "switch". We would then use 48xGigE
>>> and 1x24 SFP+ line cards. Our actual port requirements and somewhat
>>> flexible but we do need at least 4x10G Fiber ports. And at least 48
>>> GigE ports for players or access switches.
>>
>> I don't really understand your topology. 2001-2004 I was involved in
>> providing network connectivity to around 2500-4500 users at
>> Dreamhack, back then the largest LAN in the world as far as we knew.
>> Back then we made do with 2x100FE for 20 computers and the core
>> connectivity was 2xGE. I'd say your design seems to fairly similar,
>> but with 2x10GE instead, but I'm just guessing from what you wrote.
>>
>> ASR9k has been used before and will do just fine. Dreamhack has grown
>> a bit since I was involved:
>>
>> http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/products/collateral/routers/asr-9000-series-aggregation-services-routers/dreamhack_v4acs_final.pdf
>>
>> http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/107245-inside-the-worlds-largest-lan-party
>>
>> http://www.pack4dreamhack.nl/interviews/dreamhack-behind-the-scenes-network/
>>
>>
>>> I'm also open to any suggestion within Cisco portfolio. Our needs
>>> are pretty standard and nothing extraordinary but we would like to
>>> use this opportunity in order to try new equipment and technologies
>>> that are usually only seem within ISP and large networks.
>>
>> Don't forget to provide dual stack (IPv4 and IPv6) connectivity.
>> Limit your broadcast domains (I'd say 20-50 users per broadcast
>> domain), and make sure you do antispoofing (BCP38) for everybody.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list