[c-nsp] bgp scalability C7600

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 08:56:43PM +0100, james list wrote:
> Hi gert
> Good info.
> 
> From customer requirements and  pricing point of view the idea is to
> replace with a nexus.

I'm not sure if I understand Nexus positioning (well, I'm actually fairly
sure that I do *not* :) ), so I can't really comment on that.

ASR1k is also supposed to have a very good and fast BGP implementation.

So it really depends on number of interfaces, expected throughput, operating
system preferences (IOS XR is what I always wanted, from day one :-) ),
etc.

gert

-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 291 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20150206/bd6df83f/attachment.sig>