[c-nsp] bgp scalability C7600
Mark Tinka
mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Sat Feb 7 12:54:16 EST 2015
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 7/Feb/15 18:50, Gert Doering wrote:
>
>
> Well, maybe they should upgrade their old Sup2... - 30 minutes is way
> too slow, even for a Sup720/RSP720.
>
> If I reboot one of ours that has a full feed from an upstream provider
> it takes about 5-10 minutes to load, install and distribute (iBGP) the
> table. Still too long, but 30 minutes...??
Being a tiny CPU, it's probably too busy processing routes on a
consistent basis (worse if the code is old that BGP Scanner is more
prominent).
We've seen the same on PRP-2 RP's.
Mark.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=5LSy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list