[c-nsp] CE Router performance
CiscoNSP List
cisconsp_list at hotmail.com
Tue Feb 17 19:50:25 EST 2015
Thanks Lukas - The numbers quoted were from Cisco (Our Cisco AM, and he engaged a 1900 "specialist" @ Cisco)..there recommendation (Of course) is to go for a larger CE to get guaranteed(required) throughputs...I was more interested in clarifying the duplex/half-duplex, which you have done(Cheers)
> From: luky-37 at hotmail.com
> To: cisconsp_list at hotmail.com; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [c-nsp] CE Router performance
> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 01:28:01 +0100
>
> > Quick question on Cisco's claimed performance figures for CE's
> >
> > - Cisco claim a 1921 could do 400Mb
>
> I don't believe Cisco is claiming any such thing, they usually play it safe.
>
> Cisco positions the 1900 series quote:
> > "in high-speed WAN environments with concurrent services enabled
> > up to 15 Mbps."
>
> Now, you can push more than 100mbit/s through this box, no doubt,
> but you are completely on your own. Routerperformance slide says
> a 1941 pushes 299kpps or 150mbit/s (at 64byte packets), that gives
> you a little room and you may reach 400mbit/s in lab conditions,
> but you will be on your own (say a mandatory IOS upgrade due to
> security bugfixes introduces a forwarding performance regression?).
>
> This is really (quote) "never-to-exceed [...] feature-free CEF throughput".
>
> Datasheet doesn't guarantee anything on ISR G1/G2. Get ISR 4k for
> bandwidth guarantees.
>
>
>
> > My question is, is the 400Mb/sec and 110Mb/sec full duplex?
>
> Throughput means pushing traffic from one (ingress) interface to another
> (egress) interface, so we are talking half duplex here.
>
>
> Lukas
>
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list