[c-nsp] CE Router performance

[Adam Baxter]

Read this paper.

http://anticisco.ru/pubs/ISR_G2_Perfomance.pdf

On 18 February 2015 at 10:50, CiscoNSP List <cisconsp_list at hotmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks Lukas - The numbers quoted were from Cisco (Our Cisco AM, and he
> engaged a 1900 "specialist" @ Cisco)..there recommendation (Of course) is
> to go for a larger CE to get guaranteed(required) throughputs...I was more
> interested in clarifying the duplex/half-duplex, which you have done(Cheers)
>
>
>
>
> > From: luky-37 at hotmail.com
> > To: cisconsp_list at hotmail.com; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: RE: [c-nsp] CE Router performance
> > Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 01:28:01 +0100
> >
> > > Quick question on Cisco's claimed performance figures for CE's
> > >
> > > - Cisco claim a 1921 could do 400Mb
> >
> > I don't believe Cisco is claiming any such thing, they usually play it
> safe.
> >
> > Cisco positions the 1900 series quote:
> > > "in high-speed WAN environments with concurrent services enabled
> > > up to 15 Mbps."
> >
> > Now, you can push more than 100mbit/s through this box, no doubt,
> > but you are completely on your own. Routerperformance slide says
> > a 1941 pushes 299kpps or 150mbit/s (at 64byte packets), that gives
> > you a little room and you may reach 400mbit/s in lab conditions,
> > but you will be on your own (say a mandatory IOS upgrade due to
> > security bugfixes introduces a forwarding performance regression?).
> >
> > This is really (quote) "never-to-exceed [...] feature-free CEF
> throughput".
> >
> > Datasheet doesn't guarantee anything on ISR G1/G2. Get ISR 4k for
> > bandwidth guarantees.
> >
> >
> >
> > > My question is, is the 400Mb/sec and 110Mb/sec full duplex?
> >
> > Throughput means pushing traffic from one (ingress) interface to another
> > (egress) interface, so we are talking half duplex here.
> >
> >
> > Lukas
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>