[c-nsp] ME3600 migration to something with more 10 gig ports

[Adam Vitkovsky]

> James Bensley
> Sent: 14 July 2015 11:35
 
> Much as I love this box and the ME3600s as I've said in another
> thread, Cisco's testing is utter shite. Like the ME3600 pseudowires
> coming up but not forwarding any traffic, how did they not testing
> that?!!!
> 
> James.

I'm pretty certain that they are doing only (very limited quick check via test script)
On ME3600 I remember one of the codes deleted interface descriptions -it's obvious to anybody looking at the lab config (unless there are no descriptions on the lab box)

But it makes perfect sense to me 
Why would they waste resources/money when they know we do throughout testing ourselves anyways (no matter how good they testing might have been).
Or from a different angle why would they bother designing test procedure that tests every possible permutation making sure the box is error free if no one is using certain config combinations. The live audience makes sure they only need to deal with the widely used features and not waste money on fixing features that almost no one actually uses.

  
adam