[c-nsp] ASR920 - ISR4431

Nick Cutting ncutting at edgetg.co.uk
Wed Jun 3 07:41:41 EDT 2015

Yep, I don't mind at all.  :)

Too many times it has been, "should've gone cisco" in terms of missing features stability etc. 

At least with cisco I know what works and doesn't.

-----Original Message-----
From: Gert Doering [mailto:gert at greenie.muc.de] 
Sent: 03 June 2015 12:30
To: Nick Cutting
Cc: Reuben Farrelly; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 - ISR4431


On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 10:25:45AM +0000, Nick Cutting wrote:
> I really like the 4451's - they much more like an ASR than an ISR - they do "most" things in hardware. 
> We have had to buy a lot of licences though - but this just the way that cisco is going.

Well, if you give them money for it, you support their direction.

Give your money to other vendors (or BUs, for that matter *sigh*) that are not as annoying...


USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de

More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list