[c-nsp] ASR920 - ISR4431

Gert Doering gert at greenie.muc.de
Wed Jun 3 07:55:14 EDT 2015


On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 11:41:41AM +0000, Nick Cutting wrote:
> Yep, I don't mind at all.  :)
> Too many times it has been, "should've gone cisco" in terms of missing features stability etc. 
> At least with cisco I know what works and doesn't.

I used to say that, 15 years ago...

Then they decided to split the company into in-fighting BUs...

Nowadays, I know that "it works" if I've laid my hands on it and it actually
did (and didn't lose the license to make it work on the next upgrade).

USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 291 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20150603/a5559fd7/attachment.sig>

More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list