[c-nsp] ASR902 vs ME3800X
Adam Vitkovsky
Adam.Vitkovsky at gamma.co.uk
Tue Mar 24 07:44:08 EDT 2015
> From: Mark Tinka [mailto:mark.tinka at seacom.mu]
> Sent: 24 March 2015 11:02
> One option is to have multi-level IS-IS (which I don't like, but...) and leak
> specifically between levels, if FIB slots are an issue with the 4-port. But I
> won't decide on a design until I get my hands on the thing.
I would not go down that road, remember the discussion we had some time ago where the consensus was that single level/area is soo much better simpler and features friendly compared to hierarchical models.
And anyways the main FIB consumer are the customer VPN prefixes.
> We terminate customers directly to the Metro-E boxes (ME3600X today).
> This is why a denser 48-port ASR920 is useful for us. We try to limit the need
> for boxes as much as possible, as I'm sure everybody else on this list does.
Agreed, less costs and less things to break.
> The next phase is to build cheaper sub-rings (the 2nd level I was talking
> about) which would ordinarily be done by Layer 2 boxes. So if the 4-port
> ASR920 can maintain the IP/MPLS-based Metro-E network deeper into a
> layered ring, happy days.
>
Well you could build the L2 rings as 10GE -so you'd have 2x10GE cust-agg in and 2x10GE out to MPLS.
> And yes I know the PBB-EVPN support will possibly be non-existent on MX -
> so it should not classify as proper Carrier Ethernet box :) .
>
> If you can get Juniper to commit to your feature requirements, it'll make it
> into the ACX.
>
> I haven't spent anytime on EVPN, to be honest.
>
If I understood our product guy well the statement from Juniper was that there are no slightest plans for PBB-EVPN.
Which was a true wtf moment for me as one would think they'd like the box to be a competition for ASR9k.
adam
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered safely by Mimecast.
For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list