[c-nsp] Internet in VRF

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Mon May 4 04:53:47 EDT 2015



On 4/May/15 10:46, Nathan Ward wrote:

> There were some absolutes (“all”, “only” etc.) that should perhaps have been a bit looser in your earlier email, which is what confused me there. Cool.

0.001% has no operational burden on us. It's not even something we think
about, unless it breaks or needs some love.

This is one of the reasons SR appeals to me, because, per spec., you get
the TE without the leg-work.

>   
> I can assure you it exists, I’ve even seen it myself!

Oh no, I know it exists.

But when I first deployed IPv6 back in 2005, the choice of 6PE vs.
native was an easy one... Never looked back since.

Mark.


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list