[c-nsp] ASR9006 - CG NAT - VSM-500

[Pshem Kowalczyk]

Hi,

We use the previous non-virtualised cards (ISM-100) in our 9Ks. The
experience has been generally positive. The configuration is quite simple
and the cards work well.
Do spend some time analysing various limitations of the card (pool sizes,
throughput per ServiceApp pair, allowed bulk allocation sizes (if you plan
on bulk allocation)).

I'm interested in knowing the results of your tests, as we're told by the
BU that if we want more throughput we'll have to go to VSM anyway.

kind regards
Pshem


On Fri, 6 Nov 2015 at 06:24 Aaron <aaron1 at gvtc.com> wrote:

> Hi Group,
>
>
>
> I'm going to test Nat on my ASR9006 in my lab using the RSP440-TR and the
> VSM-500.
>
>
>
> Looking for any links to information or experience you all might have on
> how
> to get going on this.
>
>
>
> I'm looking for this to be implemented at my internet boundary ASR9k so I
> will test it like that in the lab.
>
>
>
> My asr9k at my internet boundary is the PE Edge of my mpls l3vpn's internal
> to my network, so the nat would need to work like that.  The asr9k internet
> connection is PE-CE bgp, native ip connection put into my internet vrf for
> my internal customer vrf.  Same vrf.
>
>
>
> Aaron
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>