[c-nsp] Peering Router/Switch

Mon Oct 5 06:22:02 EDT 2015

Why not virtual router ?
You only need a standard server and a licence
This way you can start at lower rates and upgrade later but stay with
modern platform

In cisco you can take CSR1000v ( up to 10G ) or XRv (not sure about
performance )
and in Juniper vMX (up to 40G )

Nitzan

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu> wrote:

>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
>
>
> On 5/Oct/15 11:20, Gert Doering wrote:
>
> > > > ASR9001 is what you want for a peering router.
>
> And on the Juniper side, I'd go for the MX104.
>
> Mark.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWEkHKAAoJEGcZuYTeKm+GgDQP/Rumt8wrU8sghIOafUKuB2sm
> Duu7PUcmJDK4Ewtx/A3nFP9GWt4pVj5dZrA5anPkKqFETwB0Ml+vfzc1G08ea27C
> +vJjEZAmzMcyXOsqy6wfPS6b9uOaYCPcWioAaq5BS9wQEvk1aVxoRny7iRpQrA50
> cH3tLtAQTTrKaZw+fkKv4gTbD2E9Urcrn+AD2jil7vYTSiHAzbHKhl+zoylmU/40
> d8iVgTnWFhgP1kvf8CKTXjjd5eDUIPx5ddYZX7J/+rgMCvqZqVpVHRuFe0d8t6gs
> y1ZF1qj/Ui1Z5VL5413TGQhI4Y0cyTjOqXC5fD86HEWFwnmA1lijcFJ/FfhdkoqB
> /a4SswVy/wiRZEihAHBCay+pl8DagHIjMjs0DrqDj9FgQvbn75hoMQ5cDiEDZfWf
> jwFwhfYDkBcKDeCEFaJbK0+cm7IkgsBRNGIIxlSjwbhSWb9mexwvRp6JxCIa66rx
> Ksa+UwAAlBCRoZU+869Qs7hOr9hY8ctlovuDQYoZn7+15pZQFi+PS0bprSQFkez1
> KwqOjLfjibxNNSTAAlqs9HtwNzUg/sEszMyFUj32fFg7mb+AutUvHerEW5p1VwOO
> G0HY8Zcgn+PvQR9wgJkYvVCvj0Z+x4KUAOVzmSwSgR6WE8+utDYwfv8x4GW1E7dt
> 2mbCfRaupnPlvJ0Y64Js
> =IpEY
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>