[c-nsp] ASR920 vs ASR1001-x

CiscoNSP List CiscoNSP_list at hotmail.com
Fri Apr 29 07:02:10 EDT 2016


Dont think the ASR920 supports netflow "yet"? (Could be wrong, as it was due to support it "soonish")...supported number of VRF instances/VPLS instances etc...the ME3600's certainly had limits in these areas, but Id have to have a dig in the docco's re ASR920's....and supported # of routes differs...ASR1Ks can take a variety of SPA cards, so can support eth, atm etc - http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/asr-1000-series-aggregation-services-routers/qa_c67-452124.html


________________________________________
From: cisco-nsp <cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net> on behalf of Satish Patel <satish.txt at gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, 29 April 2016 2:00 PM
To: Cisco Network Service Providers
Subject: [c-nsp] ASR920 vs ASR1001-x

I was reading specs of ASR920 looks promising and only limitation it
can hold 20k routes except that what is the difference between ASR920
and ASR1001-x ?

speed?
performance?
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list