[c-nsp] ASR920 vs ASR1001-x

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Fri Apr 29 17:06:23 EDT 2016



On 29/Apr/16 13:02, CiscoNSP List wrote:

> Dont think the ASR920 supports netflow "yet"? (Could be wrong, as it was due to support it "soonish")...supported number of VRF instances/VPLS instances etc...the ME3600's certainly had limits in these areas, but Id have to have a dig in the docco's re ASR920's....and supported # of routes differs...ASR1Ks can take a variety of SPA cards, so can support eth, atm etc - http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/asr-1000-series-aggregation-services-routers/qa_c67-452124.html

Think of the ASR920 as a router with one testis instead of two.

It runs as a router, but there are some things it won't do due to its
target market. It's purpose-built and does that job very well.

Mark.


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list