[c-nsp] Ode to the old days

[Pedro Caetano]

It is not stacked indeed :-)

These are:
*    1   54     WS-C3750E-48PD     12.2(37)SE1
C3750E-UNIVERSAL-M
     2   54     WS-C3750E-48PD     12.2(37)SE1
C3750E-UNIVERSAL-M
sw_ARQSONY_3750E-02 uptime is 4 years, 44 weeks, 6 days, 7 hours, 21 minutes

BR,
Pedro Caetano

On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Nick Cutting <ncutting at edgetg.com> wrote:

> Let me guess - It is not stacked?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> Pedro Caetano
> Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2016 11:48 AM
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Ode to the old days
>
> Hi,
>
> I also have a c3750 with a nice uptime (still) running:
>
> sw_GRAF-3750-01#sh clock
> 16:46:24.286 PT Sat Dec 10 2016
> sw_GRAF-3750-01#sh version
> Cisco IOS Software, C3750 Software (C3750-IPBASE-M), Version 12.2(25)SEB4,
> RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) Copyright (c) 1986-2005 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
> Compiled Tue 30-Aug-05 15:47 by yenanh
>
> ROM: Bootstrap program is C3750 boot loader
> BOOTLDR: C3750 Boot Loader (C3750-HBOOT-M) Version 12.2(25r)SE1, RELEASE
> SOFTWARE (fc)
>
>  sw_GRAF-3750-01 uptime is 10 years, 43 weeks, 5 days, 18 hours, 53 minutes
>
>
> BR,
> Pedro Caetano
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Marco van den Bovenkamp <
> marco at linuxgoeroe.dhs.org> wrote:
>
> > <Raises hand>. I didn't just play with them back in the day, I still
> > own one! A CGS running IOS 8.0.
> >
> > It's actually older than the one they have in the small museum in the
> > main Cisco building here in Amsterdam. I checked :-)
> >
> > Ah, when ciscos (no capitals!) were white and the IOS documentation
> > fit in a single binder...
> >
> > On December 9, 2016 4:58:10 PM CET, Traveling Diner
> > <ccie4526 at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >You guys making reference to all these Cisco numbered-series devices...
> > >let's go back and talk AGS/AGS+, CGS, IGS... the letter-series devices.
> > >How many of ya'll got to play with the jumpers on the boards inside
> > >the
> > >AGS+? ;-)
> > >
> > >On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 4:44 AM, Saku Ytti <saku at ytti.fi> wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 9 December 2016 at 09:49, Gert Doering <gert at greenie.muc.de>
> > >wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Compare a 7200 of 15 years ago with an ASR9001 of today for list
> > >price
> > >> > insanity.
> > >>
> > >> I think 7200 and ASR1k are more apt comparison. ASR9001 should be
> > >> compared against GSR, but no small model existed.
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >>   ++ytti
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> > >>
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > >archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
> > --
> > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/
> mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>