[c-nsp] Really strange SIP (I think issue) on an ASR 1001X
Brian Turnbow
b.turnbow at twt.it
Tue Feb 9 06:30:02 EST 2016
Hi,
> Hi, this is a really strange problem for me and I’m hoping some others
> might
> have a clue because I’m a bit confused. It’s also long and involved so
> anyone
> busy or not interested stop here.
>
> I have an IPVPN service from a carrier delivered presently over a pair of
> 2921
> managed routers that carries voice traffic. I want to increase it’s
> capacity so
> the carrier is working with me to migrate these circuits on to a pair of
> ASR
> 1001X routers I have at the edge. Presently these managed devices connect
> to
> some firewalls that filter and route statically the traffic to SIP
> controllers.
> Nothing to complicated. The number of routes in the table is in the tens
> so
> very small. BGP is used to distribute routs in to the table from the
> carrier and
> to announce my networks. Not a lot of prefix filtering it seems since it’s
> a
> closed environment. My firewalls attach to the ASR pair in question in
> another
> zone but changes are made to update the static routing and security rules.
> Using their managed routers I’m able to complete calls from the PSTN
> with no issue, failover works as expected and the product works great.
> Once I
> migrate the traffic to my routers my BGP establishes rapidly, routes look
> logical
> on both sides confirmed by the carrier, I confirm end to end connectivity
> with
> the SBC from the carriers sourced interface from with in the netblock I
> receive
> service from by having pings in both directions sent and confirmed
> responses
> end to end.
> The local numbers inbound work fine. calls complete, IVR answers and
> things proceed as they should. There’s one netblock that contains toll
> FREE
> signaling and media. Calls to the toll free inbound from the carrier show
> an
> invite sent and no response, we confirmed this as best as possible with
> simple
> ACLs and filters on the other Vendor’s IP elements and we think we
> basically
> see one way signaling.
> The interesting bit is I don’t see the ACL in my ASR increment for
> matches on tcp or UDP 5060 and I don’t log any attempts at all at the
> firewall
> level. This is just one route mind you, others seem to work although the
> carrier
> does report that some fail and some work so some net blocks are skipped
> over
> and others complete. Obviously I only see matches when things complete
> which is making it hard to nail down. I confirm ping, most other
> protocols are
> blocked to the carrier but it seems we have end to end just no SIP
> signaling in
> one direction. On all blocks I can ping it’s just several SIP won’t pass.
> I don’t see any SIP ALG or any odd SIP settings in the configurations so
> I’m lost. Is there something obvious I’m missing? The link between us is
> gigabit Fiber with absolutely no unusual settings. The carrier gave me
> copies
> of their managed router configurations which I actually attempted to copy
> as
> closely as possible and that didn’t work. What am I missing, any pointers
> would be most appreciated.
I've had similar issues with a carrier here in Italy and they were related
to specific source/destination ip pairs and udp traffic.
Changing the ip on our side resolved the issue.
They say it is related to their load balancers, they reset them it works for
a month and then starts again.
A real pain to troubleshoot and convince them they had a problem...
we used sipsak for testing and sent captures for a week before they figured
it out.
Brian
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list