[c-nsp] A switch with huge number of Mac address
Adam Vitkovsky
Adam.Vitkovsky at gamma.co.uk
Sat Jan 9 08:19:10 EST 2016
>
Adam Vitkovsky
IP Engineer
T: 0333 006 5936
E: Adam.Vitkovsky at gamma.co.uk
W: www.gamma.co.uk
This is an email from Gamma Telecom Ltd, trading as “Gamma”. The contents of this email are confidential to the ordinary user of the email address to which it was addressed. This email is not intended to create any legal relationship. No one else may place any reliance upon it, or copy or forward all or any of it in any form (unless otherwise notified). If you receive this email in error, please accept our apologies, we would be obliged if you would telephone our postmaster on +44 (0) 808 178 9652 or email postmaster at gamma.co.uk
Gamma Telecom Limited, a company incorporated in England and Wales, with limited liability, with registered number 04340834, and whose registered office is at 5 Fleet Place London EC4M 7RD and whose principal place of business is at Kings House, Kings Road West, Newbury, Berkshire, RG14 5BY.
-----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> Lukas Tribus
> Sent: Friday, January 08, 2016 6:58 PM
> An interesting (brand-) new platform is the Cisco NCS 5000 series. You get a
> fixed box, for example the NCS 5002, which is 2RU, has 80x 1G/10G and 4x
> 100G ports. Runs IOS-XR and appears to be quite competitive.
>
> The datasheet [1] doesn't mention mac limits (or route limits), but its is
> certainly not the box you would use as mpls edge (carrying the full table).
>
> Not sure about the FCS date either.
>
Interesting I didn't know the NCS6K has a little brother, though it's a shame it's not nPower based.
But since it appears to be a full blown MPLS router it certainly is an interesting twist to DC architecture,
I'm thinking possibly running EVPN within DC all the way down to Servers(virtual switch) instead of FP/TRILL/SPB or VXLAN in a DC
Cause to my knowledge currently there's no option for basically redistributing ISIS to MP-BGP to realize all active data-plane forwarding between the DC and MPLS core (as we know it from IP routing i.e per flow load-sharing not per VLAN (not possible with SPB))
BGP control plane for VXLAN is the closest one but my understanding is it's not quite there yet.
adam
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list