[c-nsp] Configure port to supply PoE only

[Joshua Morgan]

Or single VLAN in suspend state?

Josh

On Friday, 15 January 2016, Chuck Church <chuckchurch at gmail.com> wrote:

> You could simply create a bogus VLAN for each AP, and put each port in a
> separate VLAN in access mode.  Pretty simple config.  Or a private isolated
> VLAN, but that is a little more config work.
>
> Chuck
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net <javascript:;>]
> On Behalf Of Ricardo Stella
> Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 5:57 PM
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net <javascript:;>
> Subject: [c-nsp] Configure port to supply PoE only
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Sorry if this might be a 'stupid' question.  I need to test a wireless
> mesh configuration and the only thing I have available to supply power to
> the access points (PoE+) is a 2960S switch.
>
> The switch is isolated to the network, but when it seems that when I add
> more than one access point to it, they are 'talking' to each other.  So is
> there a way to configure the ports so that the ports only supply power?
> The moment the second access point is connected and goes up, I start
> getting flapping errors.
>
> Thanks in advance for your help and apologies if it is indeed a dumb
> question. All I ask is that you minimize your laughs.  :)
>
> Ricardo.
>
> --
> °(((=((===°°°(((================================================
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net <javascript:;>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net <javascript:;>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/