[c-nsp] [Ext] Re: 2960X SDM Template

[Jim Glassford]

Hi Antonio,

;-)  I "assume" due to;
lanbase-routing -  Supports configuring unicast routes for static 
routing on SVIs.

I had same experience: problems on loaded switches when trying to use 
lanbase-routing, cleared up going back to lanbase-default.

best!
jim

On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 23:04:11 +0100
  Antonio Soares <amsoares at netcabo.pt> wrote:
> Yes, the “lanbase-default” seems much better than the 
>“lanbase-routing”. I just wanted to know why did they call it that 
>way… Can you share your experience ? I guess it wasn’t very good J
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> 
> Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP/DC)
> amsoares at netcabo.pt
> 
> http://www.ccie18473.net <http://www.ccie18473.net/> 
> 
> 
> 
>From: Alan Buxey [mailto:A.L.M.Buxey at lboro.ac.uk] 
> Sent: sexta-feira, 8 de Julho de 2016 21:08
> To: Antonio Soares; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 2960X SDM Template
> 
> 
> 
> Yes. Tell me about it. The values for the routing SDM are worse 
>across the board so why would you use that profile instead??? One day 
>I'll get a nice explanation ;)
> 
> alan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/