[c-nsp] ASR920 port based xconnect equivalent

[Mark Tinka]

On 3/Jun/16 12:58, Jason Lixfeld wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I’ve got a couple of ASR920s in the lab and I’m curious about how one now does port based EoMPLS relative to the ME3600X:
>
> On the ME3600, it was:
>
> !
> interface GigabitEthernet0/1
>  no switchport
>  xconnect 1.1.1.1 69 encapsulation mpls
> !
>
> Now, it appears that interface level xconnect is no longer supported in favor of full service instance configuration mode for all traffic:
>
> !
> interface GigabitEthernet0/0/1
>  service instance 1 ethernet
>   encapsulation default
>   xconnect 1.1.1.1 69 encapsulation mpls
> !
>
> Is that correct?

Yes, that is the the way you do port-mode EoMPLS on the ASR920.

As long as your "encapsulation" is "default", whatever comes in goes out
on to the pw a la port-mode EoMPLS.

Mark.