[c-nsp] ASR920 port based xconnect equivalent

[Stephen Fulton]

For posterity, here is a link to the relevant docs (at this moment in time):

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/asr920/configuration/guide/mpls/mp-l2-vpns-xe-3s-asr920-book/mp-any-transport-xe.html#GUID-FB013E0C-B37F-48CF-B2B0-374A45B9B9EC


-- Stephen

On 2016-06-03 7:25 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 3/Jun/16 12:58, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I’ve got a couple of ASR920s in the lab and I’m curious about how one now does port based EoMPLS relative to the ME3600X:
>>
>> On the ME3600, it was:
>>
>> !
>> interface GigabitEthernet0/1
>>  no switchport
>>  xconnect 1.1.1.1 69 encapsulation mpls
>> !
>>
>> Now, it appears that interface level xconnect is no longer supported in favor of full service instance configuration mode for all traffic:
>>
>> !
>> interface GigabitEthernet0/0/1
>>  service instance 1 ethernet
>>   encapsulation default
>>   xconnect 1.1.1.1 69 encapsulation mpls
>> !
>>
>> Is that correct?
>
> Yes, that is the the way you do port-mode EoMPLS on the ASR920.
>
> As long as your "encapsulation" is "default", whatever comes in goes out
> on to the pw a la port-mode EoMPLS.
>
> Mark.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>