[c-nsp] WS-X6748-SFP support

Peter Koleff pakoleff at gmail.com
Tue Jun 21 22:28:46 EDT 2016

Hi Chris,

Chris Knipe wrote:
> Sup2T/6T may be beneficial

If you intend on using the X6748 on non-PFC3 Sup, such as Sup2T (PFC4), I
believe you'll need to add a DFC4 daughter card, ie WS-F6K-DFC4-A, or look
at C6800-48P-SFP.


On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 7:19 AM, Chris Knipe <savage at savage.za.org> wrote:

> Thanks for all the chip in guys :-)
> Did read quite a bit about them on Cisco - just wanted to make sure / get
> some real life confirmations.
> Sup2T/6T may be beneficial (later) for 10G uplinks (which is -E only as far
> as I read/understand), but shouldn't be required for a while - at least not
> until traffic levels pick up.  So that, with the vpls PE limitation may
> very well be points to consider yes, and may just throw me to the -E
> chassis. DDM would be nice, but I think I can live without that for now.
> --
> Chris
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list